For my Think-Aloud, I looked at “Flight Paths“, a story of how a suburban woman and Middle-Eastern immigrant came to cross paths. I found that it was difficult to analyze the aspects of electronic literature in this piece in the first experience with the work. At the beginning of my video, I found myself making a lot of comments about the storyline, images, sounds and other sensory aspects of the piece. Perhaps I needed to sort out what was going on before I could go more in-depth into the ELit aspects of the work. I was definitely, at first analyzing the artistic components and later looking more into the structure of the literature. At first, I was looking more at the surface level and eventually became more interested in the underlying pieces of the work. I became less focused on the text and more interested in why the author presented the text in certain ways. At one point Yacub was flying and his “voice”, or textual thoughts were presented at the top of the screen. Meanwhile, the woman below had her thoughts represented at the bottom of the screen. The presentation spatially separated the two characters so that similar pieces of text could be distinguished as being the thoughts of their respective characters. This leads me to realize that although artistic choices of the author are not vital to the ELit structure, they can still be vital to producing a logical narrative.
I would like to see how my experience would change if I did the Think-Aloud with a partner. I would think a second way of thinking would diversify the comments made and direct the conversation in an even more productive direction. Having additional thoughts to add to or work off of may improve the analytical qualities of the process.
Although it was difficult to feel as though I properly analyzed the piece, I think this was a productive exercise. Recording and evaluating my process in analyzing this piece of ELit will be helpful for improving the process of critically thinking about other ELit.
For the Video Think Aloud Project I choose to read “Flight Paths” by Kate Pullinger and Chris Joseph. The work can be found in Volume two of the Electronic Literature Collection. This short video captures my initial reactions to and analysis of this piece of Electronic Literature.
Since 2013, Stanford has put on a code poetry slam where contestants create artistic pieces mediated through computer code. These forms of digital literature are interesting because they adhere to computer language syntax while often creating a text that can also be read as a poem. Because the code is legible by both the computer and the programmer, the code can perform computational tasks and simultaneously have literary meaning. The code poetry can take multiple forms. Some codes follow a strict poetic structure and can be read like a haiku, other code can be perceived as free-verse, or produce digital media once the code is executed.
Ian Holmes created the following code at Stanford’s first code poetry slam. The code follows Java syntax and can be “read” by the computer. While it doesn’t perform much within the computer, it could have more meaning when recited as a haiku.
The video below is an example of code recited as a song. The author creates legitimate code and uses several variables and commands to form song lyrics that comes together to have some coherency.
The song lyrics and code complement each other. The lyrics describe trying to erase feelings and memories of love while suggesting a struggle to do so. From my interpretation, the SQL code instructs the computer to try to delete data called “moment of love” from a database called “my_memory.” An exception will print an error statement that explicitly tells the user “Can’t delete my memories of you.” While the lyrics don’t necessarily flow, the computer process follows a logical sequence that tells gives meaning to the song. These relationships between the computer language and the interpreted text demonstrate some of the interesting literary potential of code poetry.
The structure of the code also has an influence on the recitation of the song. Each line of code is read as a separate stanza and changes the flow of the song. Similar to early computer poems such as “A Throw of the Dice Will Never Abolish Chance” the structure of the poem adds to the literary experience of the piece. Spatially separating ideas and words can add to the story-telling of the poem. For example in My good memories with s, separate lines for the words try, except and while true add slight pauses to the recitation, slightly emphasizing the words. These words are essential to the storyline and contribute to the sense of struggle and time passing. This emphasis somewhat enhances the story-telling ability of the piece.